h1

A Tragedy Remembered

December 27, 2006

A quick entry tonight in remembrance of what is most likely the most terrible natural disaster in written history, exactly two years ago today. On December 26, 2004, an earthquake in the Indian Ocean triggered a massive tsunami that ripped across South Asia, hitting Sri Lanka, south India, Thailand, Indonesia, and other countries. The horrible event left over 200,000 dead and millions without homes.

If you’d like to read more about what’s been done since the tsunami and the status of the area today, please take a look at the BBC’s article on the tsunami.

And, if you will, a moment of silence for those lost. Let’s only hope that the rest of the world will not forget this terrible tragedy and pull together to rebuild homes, families, and lives in South Asia.

h1

Height, Nutrition and Health

December 19, 2006

I was reading an article from the New Yorker recently (see credit below), and while the article was not all that new, it is still relevant today. The article basically discussed the strong correlation of height with nutrition and overall health. I already knew that height and development relied on nutrition to a point. For example, I knew that Americans of African descent are on the average several inches taller than their African-living counterparts mainly because of the malnutrition and disease that are more prevalent in many parts of Africa versus the U.S.

What I didn’t realize, though, is that caucasian American’s height has stagnated since the 1950’s and much of Europe’s average heights have continued to rise. For example, Dutch males now average 6′1″, compared to an average American height of 5′9″. And this is not an immigration issue; the studies conducted have taken caucasian Americans of European descent for their sample. Germans, Swedes, and Norwegians have also overtaken the Americans in height in the last 50 years. In fact, recent studies now show that there is little height difference between Japanese and American males.

Two things were surprising to me about this article. First is the fact that height can tell so much. Within a population, height differences are largely genetic. But height variations between populations are mostly environmental. This means that if Swedes are taller than Indonesians, this difference is due mainly to the differences in health, nutrition, and development. The historians and scientists who have been studying these trends have concluded that height is a kind of biological shortcut to compile all factors making up a society’s developmental health.

The second suprising thing is that if this data is true, America’s poor health choices are really having serious effects. Throughout history and to some degree today, a nation’s income has been a good proxy for the nourishment and health of the people. At some point, though, income does not guarantee good health, as America is richer than all of the European nations that have now surpassed America’s height. At the time of the New Yorker article, America’s life expectancy was 28th of 36 industrialized nations, behind the Japanese at the top and many of the European nations. Several studies have concluded there is a more comprehensive health care system in countries like the Netherlands, Sweden, Japan, and Germany. And anyone living in America knows about the abundance of fast food, unhealthy snacks at our schools, and diets lacking in fruits and vegetables. It is remarkable to me, though, that this could already be seen in the average heights of Americans in the last 50 years.

I would like to explore this issue a little more. If every nationality and race on Earth were given the exact same diet, standard of living, and upbringing, would we really all be the same height on average after a few generations? I definitely agree that the variations would be smaller, but would any variation remain? It seems intuitive to me that some variation would remain, but it is quite possible that all this time my view of a country or race’s height has been biased by the health and standard of living of that country.

The New Yorker article referenced was titled “The Height Gap” by Burkhard Bilger.

h1

An Inconvenient Truth

December 16, 2006

If you haven’t seen the new movie/documentary by Al Gore, entitled An Inconvenient Truth, I suggest you do so as soon as possible. It doesn’t matter if you’re a Democrat or Republican, live in America or elsewhere, or if you like Mr. Gore. This movie is about the climate change humans are causing in this world, why this change is happening, and what we can do to help this. If you want to learn more, visit the official site of Mr. Gore’s message.

A couple of highlights from the film that I can think of off the top of my head: Mr. Gore speaks to the fact that the authenticity of the global warming claim may be in question. He then presents a study showing that in the last 10 years, of 928 articles written in peer-reviewed scientific journals, exactly 0 disputed the claim of global climate change. Over that same period of time, a representative slice of news articles from the popular media on climate change showed that 53% of all articles published expressed some element of doubt about the claim of global warming. Clearly, a strong element of unfounded doubt continues to linger amongst the American people.

Which brings me to a second highlight of the movie, summarized in a quote by Upton Sinclair: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” This is a problem that goes all the way to the top. I said that this movie was for anyone, regardless of political views – and it is – but this is also a political issue. A lot of people in one industry in particular (hint: oil) don’t want to hear about global warming and rising carbon dioxide levels because they would have to change the way they do business. And they don’t want that because they want to make money. Mr. Gore equates this to another industry that had science turn against them: the tobacco industry. When the surgeon general released reports of the harm cigarette smoke causes on the body, the tobacco industry tried for years to ruin the credibility of these studies. They tried every trick in the book, and sadly, it worked for many years. The oil industry, larger and more powerful than the tobacco industry, is undoubtedly trying the exact same tricks.

Well, I’m done “preaching”. I promise most my entries won’t be this preachy, I just saw a great movie about a really serious issue, and it doesn’t seem like that many people seem too concerned. I hope this movie will help change that.

h1

Welcome

December 16, 2006

As you can see, this is the first entry of this blog, titled Comments on Current Events. Really, that’s my vague way of saying that the direction of the blog hasn’t fully been decided yet. Mostly, I will write my reactions to articles and events in science, politics, and finance. These are three distinct topics, I know, and eventually I may narrow this blog to focus much more on one of the three topic areas. For the time being, I will try to categorize each of the entries appropriately and hopefully give any readers an interesting variety of topics from which to choose. So, stay tuned and please send me your comments and questions, I’d love to hear them.